Posting to Bibframe On 06/02/2017 16:32, Jeff Edmunds wrote: Your final paragraph is what intrigues me most. How, in fact, would widespread adoption by libraries of BIBFRAME (or whatever it…

-482

Read More Re: [BIBFRAME] Failure

Share

Uncategorized

Posting to Bibframe On 02/02/2017 21:29, Karen Coyle wrote: My fave scenario for library linked data, the data flows in the opposite direction. Look at how rich an author page…

-449

Read More Re: [BIBFRAME] Failure

Share

Uncategorized

Posting to Bibframe On 02/02/2017 16:55, Jeremy Goldstein wrote: For an example, let’s say a patron is searching for a copy of the film Zootopia at my library. My holding…

-481

Read More Re: [BIBFRAME] Failure

Share

Uncategorized

Posting to Bibframe On 01/02/2017 22:25, Jeff Edmunds wrote (concerning the definition of “failure”): Widely adopted = adopted by a majority of libraries (of which, in the US, according to…

-362

Read More Re: [BIBFRAME] Failure

Share

Uncategorized

Uncategorized

Posting to RDA-L On 08/12/2016 22:10, Gene Fieg wrote: I agree. Reminds me of Gormans comment about great,but how does it work in theory. I am seeing the patron recede,…

-280

Read More RDA-L Aggregates and augmentations

Share

Uncategorized

Uncategorized

On 18/11/2016 19:08, John Gordon Marr wrote: Let me comment on the “Fors” you cite. … I was asked to summarize the responses I’d received regarding why some libraries have…

-238

Read More Why RDA?

Share

Uncategorized

Uncategorized

Uncategorized